<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone&#8217;s a Vegetarian: History in our Teeth</title>
	<link>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/</link>
	<description>Hyper-current News, Previews, and Urgent Thought on Vancouver and the World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jody Combs</title>
		<link>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>biliteral fimbristylis dentalgia needfully sextarii postvarioloid ketoside myowun
&lt;a href="http://www.bnia.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Big Noise in America&lt;/a&gt;
 http://www.barnesvanze.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>biliteral fimbristylis dentalgia needfully sextarii postvarioloid ketoside myowun<br />
<a href="http://www.bnia.com/" rel="nofollow">Big Noise in America</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.barnesvanze.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.barnesvanze.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamal Arora</title>
		<link>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamal Arora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>So intriguing! Have you ever read Carol Adams? She writes about the sexual politics of meat. In her work, she uses the linguistic term 'absent referent' to refer to a process whereby the essence of a being fades into the background and takes on a constructed meaning - for example, an 'animal' - a living entity, becomes 'meat.' In other words, we become psycho-socially disconnected from the food on our plate and enter into a hierarchical relationship of consumer (us) and Other (meat). 

In the same way - and this is truly fascinating - she argues that women, in pornography for example (and perhaps in life in general), go through this absent referent process as well. In an article she wrote in Hypathia, she writes: "Ontology recapitulates ideology. In other words, ideology creates what appears to be ontological: if women are ontologized as sexual beings (or rapeable, as some feminists argue), animals are ontologized as carriers of meat. In ontologizing women and animals as objects, our language simultaneously eliminates the fact that someone else is acting as a subject/agent/perpetrator of violence."

Anyway enough scholar talk. I think we should read her together....and then you should make me some fabulous vegetable curry. Deal? Great post darling. XO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So intriguing! Have you ever read Carol Adams? She writes about the sexual politics of meat. In her work, she uses the linguistic term &#8216;absent referent&#8217; to refer to a process whereby the essence of a being fades into the background and takes on a constructed meaning - for example, an &#8216;animal&#8217; - a living entity, becomes &#8216;meat.&#8217; In other words, we become psycho-socially disconnected from the food on our plate and enter into a hierarchical relationship of consumer (us) and Other (meat). </p>
<p>In the same way - and this is truly fascinating - she argues that women, in pornography for example (and perhaps in life in general), go through this absent referent process as well. In an article she wrote in Hypathia, she writes: &#8220;Ontology recapitulates ideology. In other words, ideology creates what appears to be ontological: if women are ontologized as sexual beings (or rapeable, as some feminists argue), animals are ontologized as carriers of meat. In ontologizing women and animals as objects, our language simultaneously eliminates the fact that someone else is acting as a subject/agent/perpetrator of violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway enough scholar talk. I think we should read her together&#8230;.and then you should make me some fabulous vegetable curry. Deal? Great post darling. XO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe</title>
		<link>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4thercrd.com/JarkTheSaint/20080206_everyones-a-vegetarian-history-in-our-teeth/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I heard about our vegetarian roots (pardon the pun).  It's a mystery why we ever learned that primates etc. ate so much meat -- wherever did our schoolsystem and parents get these crazy ideas.  We were victims, and they doubly so.  Thanks for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about our vegetarian roots (pardon the pun).  It&#8217;s a mystery why we ever learned that primates etc. ate so much meat &#8212; wherever did our schoolsystem and parents get these crazy ideas.  We were victims, and they doubly so.  Thanks for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
